 <h1>Congratulations! 🎉 </h1>
    <p style="color:#637381;">All done! You’ve completed another milestone.</p>

To continue, enter your details to log in.

We’ve sent a 6‑digit code to #MAIL_ADDRESS#\nPlease check your inbox or spam folder and enter the code below to continue.

Verification code sent

Thank you for the payment. You can now access {collectionName} by simply clicking the button below.

Yes, you’ve successfully ordered! 🎉

Unlock This Exclusive Course

It seems that your email address is not currently on the authorized access list. Please ensure you are using the email address that was invited, or contact the content owner for assistance.

Verification Required for Access

Gaps in the 2026 Act

Section 138: The Two Grounds, the Shield, and the Penalty the Bench Must Apply

The Communication Failure Loophole: The Exact Proviso, and What It Does to the Evidentiary Hierarchy

Check Your Understanding: The Statutory Gaps

Rebuilt with the verified, current statutory text of Sections 138 and 60(3) -- including the penalty provision a bench itself must apply, and the exact proviso that makes the manual form primary on a communication failure claim.

Mandatory BVAS and IReV are now law. Two provisions in the same Act quietly narrow that
gain: Section 138's shield and narrowed grounds, and Section 60(3)'s communication-failure
proviso.

Module 3: The Statutory Gaps the 2026 Act Left Open

<div class="simple-box-wrapper"> <div class="simple-box"> <div class="column"> <h3>Description</h3> <div class="ck-horizontal-line"><hr></div> <p>I'm a paragraph. Click to start writing that will inform, inspire, or encourage your community. We know you have so many things to share with the world. Happy editing!</p> </div> </div> </div>