 <h1>Congratulations! 🎉 </h1>
    <p style="color:#637381;">All done! You’ve completed another milestone.</p>

To continue, enter your details to log in.

We’ve sent a 6‑digit code to #MAIL_ADDRESS#\nPlease check your inbox or spam folder and enter the code below to continue.

Verification code sent

Thank you for the payment. You can now access {collectionName} by simply clicking the button below.

Yes, you’ve successfully ordered! 🎉

Unlock This Exclusive Course

It seems that your email address is not currently on the authorized access list. Please ensure you are using the email address that was invited, or contact the content owner for assistance.

Verification Required for Access

Start here

The decision you're learning to make

Grade it in layers

Not one grade, a layered verdict

Why grade the framework you teach

The independence keystone

The honest limits, and what would raise the grade

Name the limits and the disconfirmers

Check yourself

Knowledge check: grade the biology

Knowledge check: the grand claim

Knowledge check: why grade it

Knowledge check: the keystone needs nuance

What you can now do, and where it goes

What you can now do

Take it with you

Your grade-the-model card

References

Segment 2.5 of Module 2, grading the model itself: turn Module 1's appraisal onto the framework, grade it in layers (biology [E]; scheme and operationalisation [M]; whole-system disease claim not made), and be the practitioner who can critique their own tools. The independence keystone. Built direct.

Module 3 - Reading the Whole System (Segment 3.5: Grading the Model Itself)

<div class="simple-box-wrapper"> <div class="simple-box"> <div class="column"> <h3>Description</h3> <div class="ck-horizontal-line"><hr></div> <p>I'm a paragraph. Click to start writing that will inform, inspire, or encourage your community. We know you have so many things to share with the world. Happy editing!</p> </div> </div> </div>