 <h1>Congratulations! 🎉 </h1>
    <p style="color:#637381;">All done! You’ve completed another milestone.</p>

To continue, enter your details to log in.

We’ve sent a 6‑digit code to #MAIL_ADDRESS#\nPlease check your inbox or spam folder and enter the code below to continue.

Verification code sent

Thank you for the payment. You can now access {collectionName} by simply clicking the button below.

Yes, you’ve successfully ordered! 🎉

Unlock This Exclusive Course

It seems that your email address is not currently on the authorized access list. Please ensure you are using the email address that was invited, or contact the content owner for assistance.

Verification Required for Access

The Article 8 Framework: Razgar in Practice

Welcome to Human Rights Claims & Proportionality

The Five Razgar Questions

Razgar Checkpoint

Applying Razgar to a Real Case

Stage Recognition Checkpoint

Part 5A: The Public Interest Considerations

Section 117B: The Generally Applicable Factors

Section 117C: Deportation Cases and 'Very Compelling Circumstances'

Public Interest Checkpoint

Building a Proportionality Argument (L3 add-on)

Weighing the Scales: Structuring Your Argument

Weighing Checkpoint

Pre-empting the Home Office's Public Interest Case

Proportionality Checkpoint

Move beyond the Rules entirely: run a full Article 8 claim using the Razgar framework, apply the statutory public interest considerations correctly, and build a proportionality argument that holds up under real scrutiny.

Human Rights Claims & Proportionality

<div class="simple-box-wrapper"> <div class="simple-box"> <div class="column"> <h3>Description</h3> <div class="ck-horizontal-line"><hr></div> <p>I'm a paragraph. Click to start writing that will inform, inspire, or encourage your community. We know you have so many things to share with the world. Happy editing!</p> </div> </div> </div>